Meguro 250cc : AT Autruck 210 units than 1962 are produced & are sold as a Meguro 250cc : S7 Junior sibling car. As for major feature of the AT the small diameter, 10 IN 5.2 on the S-8(250cc) common fronts extremely being the tire, low thickly, there is an appearance, wide carrier. With the alias of "50-Kan trucks",it is the model like the roots of the tricyclic motorcycle for current conveyance. It made the same wrapping as the new model S-8 of the 250cc in other things as a feature of appearance, excluding the rear section completely it had become commonness design. The system is K5 type 248cc one cylinder OHV 4 cycle, with the electrical 12v, battery ignition, cell attachment, the S7 latter term and the specification of S-8 that way. Simply, as for speed change ratio from the condition, baggage conveyance, you hold down also setting and the full speed where a little torque becomes thick at low speed and it is the 90km/h. The plunger which also the shock absorber naturally, is superior in withstand load characteristic (the rear) you use. Is original idea as that time, but there is no market about of plan, there are no times when most sale results are obtained it ended. (sale was done to at the time of Meguro end) This is my impression, but you think with the AT is related to the birth of the S-8 little. With common opinion, answering to the resale of the S3(250cc) which is demand of the Meguro lover, it assumes it executed the model change which adds the appearance of the S3 in specification of S7. Although this opinion is also considered to be one of the reasons, it is doubtful in whether there was how much marketability those days. Rather, do you consider manufacture of AT moderately and can't say that S-8 was planned as a practical use means of the parts which were prepared for the reason for considering? As the basis, the sale time of S-8 is almost the same as AT (AT is early). And the thing which development of SGT(250cc) had already started at this time. That is, even if it is not S-8, considering sales performance, it is saying that S7 was enough. Although AT serves as [ whether it appeared by the design which makes reincarnation of S3 consider, and ] a question why, I think that it is a technique for collecting in design with the conditions on structure. There is a plunger of rear as a common feature of AT and S3. From that time, this mechanism is excellent in load-proof nature, and is first made into specification conditions from it having been reliable. If it means that the appearance of a very thick tire and a loading platform large at slight lowness united with the design of S7 in the byway at this, isn't a little heterogeneous model made? If it is the design which is not S7, although the rear part has fallen a little with the common composition of plunger structure, as the whole, the image of S3 is strong. Then, sense of incongruity is imagined by there having been nothing for AT to have become a design near S3. *** Principal statistics *** * Total length : 2,075 mm * Full-width : 880 mm * Total height : 1,045 mm * Distance between axis : 1,425 mm * Weight : 175 kgf * Engine type : K5 type: Single cylinder OHV 4 cycle * Entire aerodynamic volume displacement : 248 cc * Installed capacity : 12.5 HP / 5,400 rpm * Full speed : 90 km/h * Fuel economy : - km/L * Transmission : Advance 4 step rotary * Tire : (Front) 3.00~18-4 / (Rear) 5.20~10-4 * Starting system : Sel-motor and kick